Where do Bay Area candidates stand on public health, COVID-19 response, and mask bans?

We asked candidates for State Assembly and State Senate, County Board of Supervisors, Congress, and U.S. Senate about their positions on universal masking in healthcare, mask ban legislation, free vaccine access, plans for free mask and test distribution, and more. 

Survey invitations were sent to all candidates running for office in these races in San Francisco, Alameda, Santa Clara, Contra Costa, Napa, Sonoma, and Solano counties. The responses we received are below.

Disclaimer: SDA does not endorse political candidates. The information provided here is informational only. For our San Francisco and California propositions and measures voting guide, click here. 

Jump to a Section:

San Francisco:

Question 1: Do you support requirements for universal masking in healthcare settings?

Question 1 background information supplied to candidates: Too many seniors, disabled people, and others cannot safely access healthcare without universal masking requirements in place in healthcare settings. State and local public health departments have removed this essential protection from healthcare settings, even though we’ve tirelessly advocated with many public-health officials to have it reinstated year-round, as Covid is dangerous year-round, and healthcare settings are a place where vulnerable people must go. One-way masking is shown to be less effective than universal masking, and many people cannot mask at all: people brought to the hospital unconscious, people on oxygen, people with tracheostomies, and others. These community members deserve protection, too. Other people masking protects them.  

YES: 

  • Adlah Chisti (Board of Supervisor District 11)

  • Myrna Melgar (Board of Supervisor District 7)

  • Dean Preston (District 5 Supervisor)

  • Roberto Hernandez (District 9 Supervisor)

  • Michael Liu (SF District 11 Supervisor)

  • Bilal Mahmood (San Francisco District 5 Supervisor)

NO:

  • Stephen Martin-Pinto (District 7 Supervisor)

OTHER:

  • Jen Nossokoff (Supervisor- San Francisco District 1): Thank you for raising this crucial issue regarding healthcare access and the protection of our most vulnerable community members. I support a strategic masking approach aligned with the guidance of the medical community. This approach emphasizes high protection for seniors, disabled individuals, and others at increased risk in healthcare settings. The concept of strategic masking recognizes the ongoing risks in high-transmission or high-risk environments, such as intensive care units, oncology wards, and geriatric units, where many patients cannot mask due to medical conditions. Targeted masking in these settings aligns with recommendations from leading medical institutions and healthcare professionals who emphasize the importance of adaptable policies to reduce nosocomial infections and protect both patients and healthcare staff​. While universal masking is effective, flexibility allows us to tailor protections based on community transmission rates and specific unit needs, balancing safety with the importance of clear communication and empathy between patients and providers. As new data emerge, I would advocate for policies that maintain mask protections in high-risk situations while also considering the practical and psychological needs of both patients and healthcare workers. This strategic approach is not only adaptive but respectful of the diverse needs of those receiving and providing care, ensuring that our healthcare settings remain accessible and compassionate for all.

  • Wendy Ha Chau (District 3 Supervisor): I support nurse instructors teaching all people how to wear masks properly. Masking is ineffective UNLESS the people wearing the masks are taught how to use the mask properly. The technique that must be uses is called “‘sterile technique”. Obviously, sterlie technique can’t be used in a public settling, but the methods used to apply the mask is coupled with multiple handwashings while putting on the mask and removing the mask. Although, I believe that sterile technique must be taught to the entire public it could be modified to “clean technique”. This method will greatly reduce the spread of covid (and the general public not knowing “sterile technique” on putting on their masks and removing their masks greatly contributed to the spread of covid.

Question 2: If elected, would you oppose mask-ban legislation? 

Question 2 Background information supplied to candidates: We’re extremely concerned about the mask bans have recently passed in North Carolina; Nassau County, New York; and the UC and CSU systems. These bans have also been proposed in Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, and elsewhere in the U.S. These bans embolden harassment of people wearing masks, and they make public life inaccessible for high-risk people. And considering how frequently California is impacted by wildfire smoke, it’s crucial that we protect people’s rights to mask to protect themselves from that as well.

(For more information, see this statement from Disability Rights California that explains why these bans are so dangerous to disabled people, seniors and others.)

YES: 

  • Adlah Chisti (Board of Supervisor District 11)

  • Myrna Melgar (Board of Supervisor District 7)

  • Dean Preston (District 5 Supervisor)

  • Roberto Hernandez (District 9 Supervisor)

  • Michael Liu (SF District 11 Supervisor)

  • Bilal Mahmood (San Francisco District 5 Supervisor)

NO:

  • Stephen Martin-Pinto (District 7 Supervisor)

OTHER:

  • Jen Nossokoff (Supervisor- San Francisco District 1): “I believe that people should have the right to mask as a matter of personal protection—full stop. This is essential for allowing individuals, especially those at high risk, to navigate public spaces with a sense of security and autonomy. The nuance in mask-ban discussions arises when masks are used to obscure identities in situations involving unlawful gatherings or riots. In these instances, public safety concerns may prompt temporary and targeted restrictions on masking. However, such policies must be clearly defined with safety as the guiding priority, ensuring that bans are limited in scope and applied only in contexts where anonymity could enable harm or obstruct law enforcement. Maintaining the right to mask outside of these specific, well-defined contexts respects individual freedom and public health needs, while carefully balancing broader safety considerations. This approach ensures that protective rights are upheld without compromising communal safety.”

  • Wendy Ha Chau (District 3 Supervisor): “This is extremely disturbing. No one can pass laws banning a person from wearing a mask. The statement appears to be a mistunderstanding because if it was true, I’d be literally worth over 100,000,000 from winning so many lawsuits”

Question 3: If elected, would you work to ensure that uninsured Californians can continue to access free Covid vaccines in 2025 and beyond?

Question 3 background information supplied to candidates: The federal government has ended the Bridge Access Program, the free Covid vaccine program for uninsured/underinsured Americans. While California has extended its own version for uninsured Californians through the end of 2024, its future remains uncertain after that.

YES: 

  • Adlah Chisti (Board of Supervisor District 11)

  • Myrna Melgar (Board of Supervisor District 7)

  • Dean Preston (District 5 Supervisor)

  • Roberto Hernandez (District 9 Supervisor)

  • Michael Liu (SF District 11 Supervisor)

  • Bilal Mahmood (San Francisco District 5 Supervisor)

OTHER:

  • Stephen Martin-Pinto (District 7 Supervisor): Yes, but funding would be based on demand. If there is no demand then I will divert funding to more urgent health matters.

  • Wendy Ha Chau (District 3 Supervisor): I will ensure that seniors get 100% of their medical bills paid. In this example, it would be very easy. By changing the name of “Covid Vaccine” to “Covid/Flu Shot”, there will be no disruption made by the feds or state. Since there is no vaccine for Covid, flu or cold (any coronavirus) all therapuetics are covered by FEDs. This reclassification (based by case law) will allow seniors to get free shots at Walmart, Safeway or any local pharmacy that gives free flu shots will allow.

Question 4: If elected, what would you do to make more free Covid tests and masks available to the public?

Stephen Martin-Pinto (District 7 Supervisor): “If there is another credible COVID or other communicable disease threat, then I would consider making more testing and PPE available to the public. Otherwise, I will recommend our resources be spent on more urgent health matters.”

Adlah Chisti (Board of Supervisor District 11): “Yes”

Myrna Melgar (Board of Supervisor District 7): “I would support these made available for free through the SF Health Plan system.”

Dean Preston (District 5 Supervisor): “I took office just two months before the lockdown in March 2020, and worked closely with the Department of Public Health and service providers, such as hospitals, schools, and nonprofits, when the shelter-in-place was lifted to make sure these essential service providers had an adequate supply of masks and tests, and the resources that would allow them to reach vulnerable communities and those with limited access to healthcare.My office will continue to follow the lead of public health experts, and advocate in the budget for the costs of these programs, and also support any efforts for state or federal funding, including emergency funding, to ensure free access to Covid-19 tests and masks. Finally, public education campaigns are still necessary around Covid prevention and awareness, and the availability of masks and tests, especially in high-transmission periods or in high-risk areas. I will continue to work with City Departments and my colleagues on the Board to increase the reach of education efforts.”

Roberto Hernandez (District 9 Supervisor): “During the pandemic, I worked closely to establish the Mission Food Hub. At its peak, the Mission Food Hub distributed food to 9000 residents of SF. In addition, the food hub worked to help create the resource hub, where we distributed family relief, rent relief, and COVID-19 right to recover funds. I partnered with UCSF to create the test-to-care program and offered vaccines to thousands of residents. The test-to-care program offered COVID-19 vaccines to seniors who could not come out. We partnered with various senior housing and accepted referrals. We brought the senior’s hygiene items and received funds to buy them space heaters and blankets for the cold season. We continue to give out mask as well as COVID-19 tests on Thursdays and Fridays at the Mission Food hub site – 701 Alabama.”

Michael Liu (SF District 11 Supervisor)” “If elected, I would prioritize expanding access to free COVID tests and masks, particularly in District 11, which has a high number of seniors, many of whom I’ve met through visits to local senior centers like Catholic Charities and the Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center. Partnering with local health departments, nonprofits, and pharmacies, I would work to ensure that free COVID tests and masks are available at accessible locations like schools, community centers, and transit hubs. Pop-up distribution sites could also be set up to serve high-risk populations, especially in areas where many seniors reside. To make this sustainable, I would advocate for increased federal and state funding to support these efforts, ensuring a steady supply of resources. Additionally, I would launch public awareness campaigns to inform residents about how and where to access free tests and masks. By working closely with healthcare providers, community organizations, and pharmacies, we can expand access and protect the health of our seniors and vulnerable populations in District 11.”

Bilal Mahmood (San Francisco District 5 Supervisor): “I would partner with the Department of Public Health to advocate for investments in covid testing infrastructure and mask distribution in senior living facilities and communities of color most affected or prone to COVID risk.”

Jen Nossokoff (Supervisor- San Francisco District 1): “I will collaborate with CBO -like the Richmond Neighborhood Center and the Latino Task Force- to strengthen and expand efforts to make PPE and testing widely accessible, focusing especially on vulnerable populations. As the only supervisor with a medical background, I’m committed to championing public health initiatives that protect our community. Leveraging local resources and expertise, we can maximize outreach to ensure that essential health supplies and services reach those who need them most, reinforcing our community’s strength and commitment to health equity.”

Wendy Ha Chau (District 3 Supervisor): “Yes. The same shops that give free flu shops will also be able to give away free masks, gloves (because we must be taught to wear gloves when applying your mask and removing your mask and plenty of handwashing before and after putting on and taking off your mask) and covid tests.”

Question 5: Is there anything you would like to add about what actions you would take, if elected, to protect our community from COVID and other airborne diseases?

Stephen Martin-Pinto (District 7 Supervisor): “People have the right to make their own decisions about health within reason, as long as it poses no undue harm to themselves or the other average person. I currently see no credible argument to re-instate any lockdowns or masking requirements anywhere.”

Adlah Chisti (Board of Supervisor District 11): “Thank you for the opportunity. It is important that we all help each other in times of crisis and protect our most vulnerable populations.”

Myrna Melgar (Board of Supervisor District 7): “We have to care for each other.”

Roberto Hernandez (District 9 Supervisor): “My work during the pandemic can be demonstrated through my actions to take care of the community. The creation of the food hub was challenging, but I was able to get a lot of volunteers. Volunteers would help distribute the food and do drop-offs to seniors and families with many children. During the food line, we noticed many children not connecting to distance learning, and I helped create a space for them to get help and for families to connect to the internet. This resulted in the creation of the very first student hub in the city. I also partnered with various city departments to offer family relief services, rental relief services, and displaced worker assistance. The hubs continue to provide recovery services and health services to the community. We are still offering the new COVID-19 vaccine at our 24th Street location, and last Friday, we vaccinated 174 uninsured against COVID-19. We also provide diabetes and cholesterol screening. This has required a lot of advocacy work, and if elected, I will continue to advocate and be the champion of protecting SF residents from airborne diseases. I have demonstrated experience, and I am the candidate in the race who worked every day during the pandemic, getting services to the residents who did not have access. My team distributed COVID-19 tests and masks to essential workers and anyone who has to be out during the pandemic. I will continue to advocate and fight for these services as it keeps our community healthier.”

Michael Liu (SF District 11 Supervisor)” “If elected, I would take a comprehensive approach to protecting our community from COVID and other airborne diseases by focusing on prevention, education, and equitable access to healthcare resources. I would push for continued free access to masks, vaccines, and testing, ensuring that residents, especially those in high-risk areas like District 11, can easily access protective measures. Given that District 11 has a high population of seniors, I would work to increase resources at senior centers, like those I’ve visited at Catholic Charities and the Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center, to ensure that the elderly have the tools they need to protect themselves. Partnering with healthcare providers and community organizations, we could distribute resources efficiently across the district. 

In addition, I would advocate for improved ventilation standards in public spaces like schools, businesses, and public transit to reduce the spread of airborne diseases. I would support city-wide health campaigns to increase awareness of preventive measures, encouraging residents to stay updated with vaccinations and follow public health guidelines. By ensuring equitable access to healthcare resources, expanding public education, and improving infrastructure, we can better protect our community from COVID and future health challenges.”

Bilal Mahmood (San Francisco District 5 Supervisor): “Advocate for subsidized COVID testing, and coordinate backward and forward contact tracing to contain future outbreaks.”

Jen Nossokoff (Supervisor- San Francisco District 1): “Throughout the pandemic, I led clinical medicine teams for COVID-19 vaccine clinics in the Mission, Tenderloin, and other underserved areas, a role that strengthened my commitment to health equity. I am proud to be a co-author of a community-based vaccination strategy study that highlights the effectiveness of targeted, community-rooted approaches, particularly in reaching underserved Latinx populations​. 

Whether elected or not, I will keep advocating for public health strategies that ensure accessible testing, PPE, and vaccinations, safeguarding vulnerable populations from COVID-19 and other airborne diseases. Protecting public health will always be a priority, deeply rooted in the work I’ve done and the principles I uphold.  https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8452046/

Wendy Ha Chau (District 3 Supervisor): “The best action anyone can take is provide affordable housing in San Francisco for all seniors at $350 a month for a 1bd/1ba or $450 a month for a 2bd/2ba (that way a health nurse or caregiver can stay there if required). Good, clean housing for seniors is the best preventative measure that can be taken. San Francisco has $19 billions in land and assets, a $16 billion annual budget and 34,500 employees (at least 3,000 of those people are qualified to build affordable housing). With adding $0 tax dollars to our budget, SF can build 100,000 affordable housing units on already existing SF owned property. But, if we choose to get federal grants for an extra $40K per unit, these affordable housing will be luxury apartments. Here is an example of how SF currently builds affordable housing (that no one can afford).

“New Asia project located at 772 + 758 Pacific Avenue in the heart of the oldest Chinatown in the nation is developing a 15-story 100% affordable housing for extremely low-income seniors in San Francisco. The project is planning a total of 175 affordable units comprised of studios and 1-bedroom units. In order to achieve a 15-story high-rise, the project is going through establishing a Special Use District (SUD).

Contractor: Cahill Contractors LLC / Pilot JV

Architect: HCLA/STAS

Construction Type: Type I

Development Cost: ~$168 Million ($960K per unit over budget)”

The question becomes, why is it so expensive? 

Because nonprofits (who pay their employees a lot of money) hires private developers/contractors that charges San Francisco a lot of money to build these buildings.

Current politicians and bureaucrats believe that we recoup losses by the fees we charge to build (which is foolish thinking).

We must use our highly skilled UNION employees who are plumbers, architects, civil engineers and general construction workers to do the work. They get paid regardless if they build a house or not. If we set aside 60,000 units for the working class of SF employees and persons in the service industry (who’ll pay on average $1,000 a month) SF will generate $720 million in annual revenue being landlords.

The 40,000 set aside for seniors (62+) and veterans will generate an extra $192million a year in revenue.

BTW, these 100,000 affordable housing units will be placed in the downtown & financial district…so zoning will not be an issue. I will address public safety and transit is good there and everything is either walk-able or can be easily accessed via transit.

Plus, I will invest taxes into revamping a para-transit system.

The second thing we must do is spread awareness of the dangers of marijuana smoke, which contains 100X more NH3 (a type of ammonia that stems from burnt ammonia salts that creates the white smoke). Some research has shown that this ammonia carries the covid-19 virus and allows it to stay “alive” much longer thus getting us all infected much easier that a “regular” flu that is not airborne (in the true sense of the word “airborne”. Marijuana smoke travels 100’s of feet and a person smoking weed who has Covid, can potentially infect everyone in a 150′ radius…or anyone who can smell the marijuana smoke could potentially get their Covid. Again, this research is inconclusive but peer reviews should be starting.

So, basically, I would inform the public to not smoke anything if you have Covid. Thus really needing to give smokers covid tests.

Alameda County/East Bay: 

Question 1: Do you support requirements for universal masking in healthcare settings?

Question 1 background information supplied to candidates: Too many seniors, disabled people, and others cannot safely access healthcare without universal masking requirements in place in healthcare settings. State and local public health departments have removed this essential protection from healthcare settings, even though we’ve tirelessly advocated with many public-health officials to have it reinstated year-round, as Covid is dangerous year-round, and healthcare settings are a place where vulnerable people must go. One-way masking is shown to be less effective than universal masking, and many people cannot mask at all: people brought to the hospital unconscious, people on oxygen, people with tracheostomies, and others. These community members deserve protection, too. Other people masking protects them.  .  

YES:

  • Margot Smith (CA State Assembly District 14)

  • John Bauters (Alameda County Supervisor – District 5)

  • Nikki Fortunato Bas (Alameda County Supervisor District 5)

  • Elizabeth Ortega (California State Assembly District 20)

  • Jovanka Beckles (California State Senate District 7)

OTHER:

  • Jerry McNerney (California State Senate District 5): “I believe in prioritizing the safety of vulnerable populations in healthcare settings, including seniors and those with serious health conditions. It’s important to strike a balance between maintaining public health and ensuring policies are responsive to evolving circumstances and scientific evidence.”

Question 2: If elected, would you oppose mask-ban legislation? 

Question 2 background information supplied to candidates: We’re extremely concerned about the mask bans have recently passed in North Carolina; Nassau County, New York; and the UC and CSU systems. These bans have also been proposed in Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, and elsewhere in the U.S. These bans embolden harassment of people wearing masks, and they make public life inaccessible for high-risk people. And considering how frequently California is impacted by wildfire smoke, it’s crucial that we protect people’s rights to mask to protect themselves from that as well.

(For more information, see this statement from Disability Rights California that explains why these bans are so dangerous to disabled people, seniors and others.)

YES:

  • Margot Smith (CA State Assembly District 14)

  • John Bauters (Alameda County Supervisor – District 5)

  • Nikki Fortunato Bas (Alameda County Supervisor District 5)

  • Jerry McNerney (California State Senate District 5)

  • Elizabeth Ortega (California State Assembly District 20)

  • Jovanka Beckles (California State Senate District 7)

Question 3: If elected, would you work to ensure that uninsured Californians can continue to access free Covid vaccines in 2025 and beyond?

Question 3 background information supplied to candidates: The federal government has ended the Bridge Access Program, the free Covid vaccine program for uninsured/underinsured Americans. While California has extended its own version for uninsured Californians through the end of 2024, its future remains uncertain after that.

YES:

  • Margot Smith (CA State Assembly District 14)

  • John Bauters (Alameda County Supervisor – District 5)

  • Nikki Fortunato Bas (Alameda County Supervisor District 5)

  • Jerry McNerney (California State Senate District 5)

  • Elizabeth Ortega (California State Assembly District 20)

  • Jovanka Beckles (California State Senate District 7)

Question 4: If elected, what would you do to make more free Covid tests and masks available to the public?

Margot Smith (CA State Assembly District 14): “Yes”

John Bauters (Alameda County Supervisor – District 5): “I believe that prevention interventions should be publicly subsidized. I believe the County should negotiate discounted rates for COVID testing to the population at-large and should subsidize testing and PPE provisions for low-income and at-risk populations. I also believe these need to be provided to the community through trusted linguistic and culturally appropriate providers like FQHC’s and community wellness centers to reduce barriers, stigmas, and delays in helping people access care.”

Nikki Fortunato Bas (Alameda County Supervisor District 5): “Affordable and accessible healthcare options are one of my priorities. We need to consider investing in maintaining health, not simply responding to healthcare crises. Providing COVID-19 tests and masks to the public is a simple, low-cost way to keep our community healthy and minimize costs down the line.”

Jerry McNerney (California State Senate District 5): “As someone who has long prioritized public health and community resilience, I would take meaningful steps to ensure COVID tests and masks are available at no cost to Californians. I’ve worked to secure federal resources for community health initiatives, like funding for our local clinics and hospitals, and I will continue to fight for programs that provide critical supplies to those who need them.”

Elizabeth Ortega (California State Assembly District 20): “I will work to secure consistent funding to ensure that free COVID-19 testing and masks remain accessible to everyone, particularly in vulnerable and high-need communities. This includes pushing for state partnerships with local pharmacies, health centers, and community organizations to make distribution easy and widespread. I will advocate for state subsidies and bulk purchasing to keep costs low, along with public education campaigns to raise awareness about the availability of these resources.”

Jovanka Beckles (California State Senate District 7): “As an AC Transit Boardmember, I was instrumental in providing free masks (PPE) for all riders and employees. I also directed staff to create protective shields for bus operators.As a California state senator, I could build upon my healthcare experience and work with DREDF, senior and disability rights advocates to push for increased access to free COVID-19 tests and masks, especially for high-risk groups. I will propose state funding to expand the distribution of free COVID-19 tests and high-quality masks, in order to prioritize vulnerable populations, including seniors, people with disabilities, and those in independent living facilities. I would use my platform to emphasize the public health benefits of preventive measures. I will also work with local health departments, community clinics, and advocacy groups like DREDF, Pan End it!, Independent Living Resource Center, The Center for Independent Living, Golden Gate Senior Services and other advocacy groups to establish or expand programs distributing tests and masks directly through accessible venues, like senior centers, pharmacies, and public transit locations. I will work to mandate distribution sites. Advocate for state regulations requiring that any COVID-19 response includes accessible and equitable distribution channels; ensuring that supplies are available in rural and low-income areas and at transportation hubs. Working with my colleagues, I will work to incentivize manufacturers for accessibility by pushing for incentives to encourage manufacturers to produce accessible test kits and PPE, including easy-to-open packaging and instructions in multiple formats for people with disabilities. Lastly, I will create public education campaigns focused on educating the public, especially high-risk groups, about where and how to access free COVID-19 tests and masks.”

Question 5: Is there anything you would like to add about what actions you would take, if elected, to protect our community from COVID and other airborne diseases?

Margot Smith (CA State Assembly District 14): “Improve indoor air through filters and access to better air circulation. See Berkeley Measure HH.”

John Bauters (Alameda County Supervisor – District 5): “Protecting public health is the primary purpose of the County government. I would follow the guidance of health experts who are working every day to protect seniors, people living with disabilities, at-risk and immune-compromised populations, as well as frontline workers and care providers to ensure that we proactively reduce the risk of disease spread by utilizing best practices. In my professional career, I litigated environmental quality standards in public and other subsidized housing against negligent property owners. I would work to partner with health professionals now as I did then to ensure we create safe, healthy environments for people to live and receive care.”

Nikki Fortunato Bas (Alameda County Supervisor District 5): “I will rely on partnerships with groups like the California Nurses Association and National Union of Healthcare Workers, both have endorsed my campaign, so that I have expert opinions on how to learn from the recent COVID-19 pandemic and protect the community from future outbreaks.”

Jerry McNerney (California State Senate District 5): “As your representative, I have always prioritized protecting public health and supporting the well-being of our community. If elected, I will continue this commitment by advocating for accessible healthcare resources to reduce the spread of COVID and other airborne illnesses. My previous efforts, including securing funds for advanced healthcare infrastructure and community programs, have taught me that proactive investments in public health are essential. Public health remains a priority, and I will work tirelessly to ensure our community has the resources and protections it needs.”

Elizabeth Ortega (California State Assembly District 20): “By strengthening our healthcare infrastructure and prioritizing preventative measures, I am committed to making California a leader in accessible healthcare and public health safety.”Jovanka Beckles (California State Senate District 7): “I will be a trusted champion. I am the only candidate in the healthcare field and the only candidate not taking money from Big Pharma, Big Insurance and other corporations that benefit from keeping communities sick.”

Santa Clara:

Question 1: Do you support requirements for universal masking in healthcare settings?

Question 1 background information supplied to candidates: Too many seniors, disabled people, and others cannot safely access healthcare without universal masking requirements in place in healthcare settings. State and local public health departments have removed this essential protection from healthcare settings, even though we’ve tirelessly advocated with many public-health officials to have it reinstated year-round, as Covid is dangerous year-round, and healthcare settings are a place where vulnerable people must go. One-way masking is shown to be less effective than universal masking, and many people cannot mask at all: people brought to the hospital unconscious, people on oxygen, people with tracheostomies, and others. These community members deserve protection, too. Other people masking protects them.  

YES:

  • Sally Lieber (County Supervisor, District 5 Santa Clara County)

NO:

  • Ted Stroll (California Assembly District 25)

OTHER:

  • Madison Nguyen (Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, District 2): “I fully support protecting our seniors and people with disabilities. I’d like to seek more information with input from the healthcare workers to better educate myself on this issue.”

  • Betty Dong (Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 2):  “It is vital to protect the health and safety of seniors, folks with disabilities, and others who have been made vulnerable. As an elected member of the Board of Supervisors, I will carefully consider the recommendations of our Public Health Director in regard to masking requirements for our health system and our County. Dr. Cody and the County of Santa Clara have demonstrated effective leadership.”

  • Margaret Abe-Koga (Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 5): “I support masking when necessary to protect our most vulnerable populations. This includes providing areas where these populations are able to gain safe access to healthcare. But I also believe we should provide access to those who are unwilling to mask so that they also can have access to healthcare but in a way that does not jeopardize the safety of vulnerable populations. I support the New England Journal of Medicine’s perspective, recommending strategic masking to protect patients from all respiratory viral infections. With strategic masking policies, healthcare facilities could apply masking requirements by aligning them to specific levels of virus transmission in the community, activities of employees, and individual patients’ risks. With the winter respiratory virus period approaching, our local healthcare settings should follow local county health orders as appropriate.”

Question 2: If elected, would you oppose mask-ban legislation? 

Question 2 background information supplied to candidates: We’re extremely concerned about the mask bans have recently passed in North Carolina; Nassau County, New York; and the UC and CSU systems. These bans have also been proposed in Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, and elsewhere in the U.S. These bans embolden harassment of people wearing masks, and they make public life inaccessible for high-risk people. And considering how frequently California is impacted by wildfire smoke, it’s crucial that we protect people’s rights to mask to protect themselves from that as well.

(For more information, see this statement from Disability Rights California that explains why these bans are so dangerous to disabled people, seniors and others.)

YES:

  • Madison Nguyen (Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, District 2)

  • Betty Duong (Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 2)

  • Sally Lieber (County Supervisor, District 5, Santa Clara County, California)

  • Margaret Abe-Koga (Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 5)

OTHER:

  • Ted Stroll (California Assembly District 25): “Such legislation should be tailored to prevent assailants from attacking people on university campuses and other locations with impunity.”

Question 3: If elected, would you work to ensure that uninsured Californians can continue to access free Covid vaccines in 2025 and beyond?

Question 3 background information supplied to candidates: The federal government has ended the Bridge Access Program, the free Covid vaccine program for uninsured/underinsured Americans. While California has extended its own version for uninsured Californians through the end of 2024, its future remains uncertain after that.

YES:

  • Madison Nguyen (Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, District 2)

  • Betty Duong (Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 2)

  • Sally Lieber (County Supervisor, District 5, Santa Clara County, California)

  • Margaret Abe-Koga (Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 5)

  • Ted Stroll (California Assembly District 25)

Question 4: If elected, what would you do to make more free Covid tests and masks available to the public?

Ted Stroll (California Assembly District 25): “Adequate funding for both items, and for vaccinations.”

Madison Nguyen (Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, District 2): “I would work with our County health department to provide masks and tests through trusted community organizations like senior centers and Meals on Wheels and make masks freely available at facilities frequented by the public including community centers, libraries and the DMV. We want to make it easy for residents to get what they need, when they need it.”

Betty Duong (Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 2): “I would support the proven success of the County of Santa Clara to ensure all members of the public have access to healthcare and health coverage, including Covid tests and masks as well as other necessary healthcare services, equipment, and tests.”

Sally Lieber (County Supervisor, District 5, Santa Clara County, California): “I will implement universal availability of tests and masks through rigorous community outreach and outreach to clinics, schools, local cities and community organizations.”

Margaret Abe-Koga (Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 5): “If elected as a County Supervisor, I would advocate for increased access to health care resources for all our residents, including protections for residents from COVID and other airborne diseases. Additionally I would work to increase Medi-Cal enrollment for residents who qualify. We all saw the critical role that County Public Health Departments played during the pandemic, and I support a robust Public Health Department and Santa Clara Valley Health & Hospital System as we move forward. We must continue to plan for future pandemics, building upon the lessons learned from our recent experience. I will welcome and invite continued input from older adults, people with disabilities, and experts from our medical and scientific communities.”

Question 5: Is there anything you would like to add about what actions you would take, if elected, to protect our community from COVID and other airborne diseases?

Ted Stroll (California Assembly District 25): “Mandatory year-round masking in health-care facilities will bring about unintended consequences. Also, at Kaiser Permanente, when the county required masking last winter, I saw most people using all-but-useless surgical masks, and plenty of them had the mask cover only their mouth, or they had a beard that defeated the purpose. Some wore them like a chin-strap! I don’t know if that was a form of quiet defiance or rather that they were tired of having their glasses fogged.The law can be an unproductive blunt instrument and mandatory year-round masking would be an example of that. I think it would be widely flouted and cause resentment, as people would see it as hygiene theater if it involves poorly worn masks, surgical masks, etc. I encourage you to rethink your position on this issue.”

Madison Nguyen (Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, District 2): “We are still grappling with the effects of COVID and still do not know fully about the impact of long COVID on sufferers. It’s critical we are vigilant in taking steps to protect vulnerable members of our community and I want to work closely with the disability community to make sure we’re meeting its needs based on input from our disabled residents. Your safety and health matters to me.”

Betty Duong (Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 2): “It was my honor to serve as the County’s Lead Public Information Officer during the pandemic alongside many of my County colleagues who were also activated as Disaster Service Workers. The County of Santa Clara impacted so many families through timely and effective action, allocation of resources, and effective collaboration with the public and non-profit community providers, as well as other local governments, the state and the federal government. As an elected member of the Board of Supervisors, I will ensure that the County of Santa Clara continues to prepare for future disasters and pandemics. When they occur, I will commit myself to working with my colleagues and the administration to ensure the health and safety of the constituents of District 2 and the residents of the entire county, especially those who are elderly and/or disabled.”
Sally Lieber (County Supervisor, District 5, Santa Clara County, California): “Community education, outreach, and free supplies of tests and masks are essential to prevent spread of COVID, flu, other airborne diseases, and the effects indoor and outdoor air pollution.”

San Mateo:

Question 1: Do you support requirements for universal masking in healthcare settings?

Question 1 background information supplied to candidates: Too many seniors, disabled people, and others cannot safely access healthcare without universal masking requirements in place in healthcare settings. State and local public health departments have removed this essential protection from healthcare settings, even though we’ve tirelessly advocated with many public-health officials to have it reinstated year-round, as Covid is dangerous year-round, and healthcare settings are a place where vulnerable people must go. One-way masking is shown to be less effective than universal masking, and many people cannot mask at all: people brought to the hospital unconscious, people on oxygen, people with tracheostomies, and others. These community members deserve protection, too. Other people masking protects them.   

OTHER:

  • Lisa Gauthier (San Mateo County Board of Supervisor District 4): Recent guidelines recommend that healthcare facilities assess risks, involve stakeholders, and consider local metrics to determine the need for universal masking. The CDC advises universal masking during COVID-19 outbreaks. The decision to implement year-round masking depends on factors like disease prevalence and patient vulnerability, requiring careful consideration of scientific evidence and facility needs.

Question 2: If elected, would you oppose mask-ban legislation? 

Question 2 background information supplied to candidates: We’re extremely concerned about the mask bans have recently passed in North Carolina; Nassau County, New York; and the UC and CSU systems. These bans have also been proposed in Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, and elsewhere in the U.S. These bans embolden harassment of people wearing masks, and they make public life inaccessible for high-risk people. And considering how frequently California is impacted by wildfire smoke, it’s crucial that we protect people’s rights to mask to protect themselves from that as well.

(For more information, see this statement from Disability Rights California that explains why these bans are so dangerous to disabled people, seniors and others.)

YES

  • Lisa Gauthier (San Mateo County Board of Supervisor District 4) 

Question 3: If elected, would you work to ensure that uninsured Californians can continue to access free Covid vaccines in 2025 and beyond?

Question 3 background information supplied to candidates: The federal government has ended the Bridge Access Program, the free Covid vaccine program for uninsured/underinsured Americans. While California has extended its own version for uninsured Californians through the end of 2024, its future remains uncertain after that.

YES

  • Lisa Gauthier (San Mateo County Board of Supervisor District 4) 

Question 4: If elected, what would you do to make more free Covid tests and masks available to the public?

Lisa Gauthier (San Mateo County Board of Supervisor District 4): “If elected, I would work to improve access to free COVID-19 tests and masks, government initiatives should prioritize the effective distribution of these resources. This can be accomplished by partnering with pharmacies and community health centers and launching public awareness campaigns to inform individuals about how to access them. It is crucial to ensure that the distribution process is straightforward and accessible, providing clear instructions on how to order and use the tests and masks. This strategy is essential for encouraging widespread public utilization.”

Question 5: Is there anything you would like to add about what actions you would take, if elected, to protect our community from COVID and other airborne diseases?

Lisa Gauthier (San Mateo County Board of Supervisor District 4): Communities can boost protection against COVID-19 and airborne diseases by staying updated on vaccinations, practicing good hygiene, ensuring proper ventilation, wearing masks, and avoiding crowded spaces. It’s important to adapt these practices to specific needs and stay informed.

Contra Costa: 

Question 1: Do you support requirements for universal masking in healthcare settings?

Question 1 background information supplied to candidates: Too many seniors, disabled people, and others cannot safely access healthcare without universal masking requirements in place in healthcare settings. State and local public health departments have removed this essential protection from healthcare settings, even though we’ve tirelessly advocated with many public-health officials to have it reinstated year-round, as Covid is dangerous year-round, and healthcare settings are a place where vulnerable people must go. One-way masking is shown to be less effective than universal masking, and many people cannot mask at all: people brought to the hospital unconscious, people on oxygen, people with tracheostomies, and others. These community members deserve protection, too. Other people masking protects them.  

YES

  • Anamarie Avila Farias (CA State Assembly District 15)

  • Marisol Rubio (CA Senate District 9)

Question 2: If elected, would you oppose mask-ban legislation? 

Question 2 background information supplied to candidates: We’re extremely concerned about the mask bans have recently passed in North Carolina; Nassau County, New York; and the UC and CSU systems. These bans have also been proposed in Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, and elsewhere in the U.S. These bans embolden harassment of people wearing masks, and they make public life inaccessible for high-risk people. And considering how frequently California is impacted by wildfire smoke, it’s crucial that we protect people’s rights to mask to protect themselves from that as well.

(For more information, see this statement from Disability Rights California that explains why these bans are so dangerous to disabled people, seniors and others.)

YES

  • Anamarie Avila Farias (CA State Assembly District 15)

  • Marisol Rubio (CA Senate District 9)

Question 3: If elected, would you work to ensure that uninsured Californians can continue to access free Covid vaccines in 2025 and beyond?

Question 3 background information supplied to candidates: The federal government has ended the Bridge Access Program, the free Covid vaccine program for uninsured/underinsured Americans. While California has extended its own version for uninsured Californians through the end of 2024, its future remains uncertain after that.

YES

  • Anamarie Avila Farias (CA State Assembly District 15)

  • Marisol Rubio (CA Senate District 9)

Question 4: If elected, what would you do to make more free Covid tests and masks available to the public?

Anamarie Avila Farias (CA State Assembly District 15): “Public health and safety must come first, and we’ve learned during the pandemic just how vital it is to ensure that resources like tests and protective equipment are available to all, especially in times of crisis.I would work to secure state funding and partnerships with local health departments and community organizations to set up accessible distribution centers for COVID tests and masks, making sure that these resources reach those who need them most, including low-income families and vulnerable populations. Additionally, I would advocate for policies that ensure rapid test availability at schools, workplaces, and community centers, helping us prevent outbreaks and keep our communities safe. Access to testing and protective equipment shouldn’t be a privilege; it’s a necessity. I’m committed to ensuring that everyone in our district has the tools they need to stay healthy and protect their families.”

Marisol Rubio (CA Senate District 9): “Provide deliverable free covid tests and masks to all who cannot afford it. Provide free supplies at their local pharmacies in the event of an urgent need.”

Question 5: Is there anything you would like to add about what actions you would take, if elected, to protect our community from COVID and other airborne diseases?

Anamarie Avila Farias (CA State Assembly District 15): If elected, I am committed to taking proactive measures to protect our community from COVID and other airborne diseases. This means ensuring that our public health infrastructure is equipped to respond swiftly and effectively to future health challenges. I will work to increase funding for local health departments so they can expand testing, vaccination, and distribution of personal protective equipment like masks and air purifiers, especially in high-risk areas such as schools, senior centers, and community centers.

Additionally, I will push for investment in improving ventilation systems in public buildings, schools, and workplaces to reduce the spread of airborne diseases. Clean air is critical to keeping our community safe and healthy. I will also advocate for accessible health education, so that residents understand how to protect themselves and their families in the face of emerging health threats.

I believe in a collaborative approach to public health, working with local leaders, healthcare providers, and community organizations to ensure that we are prepared, informed, and equipped to keep our community safe. Together, we can make sure that everyone has access to the resources and information they need to stay healthy.”

Marisol Rubio (CA Senate District 9): “It is important for us as legislators to follow the science and not opinions as it pertains to the health and safety of all residents, especially people who are disabled or elderly.”

Multiple/Regional Districts: 

Question 1: Do you support requirements for universal masking in healthcare settings?

Question 1 background information supplied to candidates: Too many seniors, disabled people, and others cannot safely access healthcare without universal masking requirements in place in healthcare settings. State and local public health departments have removed this essential protection from healthcare settings, even though we’ve tirelessly advocated with many public-health officials to have it reinstated year-round, as Covid is dangerous year-round, and healthcare settings are a place where vulnerable people must go. One-way masking is shown to be less effective than universal masking, and many people cannot mask at all: people brought to the hospital unconscious, people on oxygen, people with tracheostomies, and others. These community members deserve protection, too. Other people masking protects them.    

OTHER:

  • Dalila Epperson (State Assembly District 30 – Santa Cruz, San Luis Obispo, Monterey Counties): 

“I was a nurse and all medical professionals know that masks do not prevent viral or bacterial infection, unfortunately.” 

  • Chris Coulombe (2nd Congressional District California – North Coast Region): I have not seen sufficient empirical evidence to support masking around Year-round masking. If you have some, I’ll be interested in seeing more. 

Question 2: If elected, would you oppose mask-ban legislation? 

Question 2 background information supplied to candidates: We’re extremely concerned about the mask bans have recently passed in North Carolina; Nassau County, New York; and the UC and CSU systems. These bans have also been proposed in Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, and elsewhere in the U.S. These bans embolden harassment of people wearing masks, and they make public life inaccessible for high-risk people. And considering how frequently California is impacted by wildfire smoke, it’s crucial that we protect people’s rights to mask to protect themselves from that as well.

(For more information, see this statement from Disability Rights California that explains why these bans are so dangerous to disabled people, seniors and others.)

OTHER:

  • Dalila Epperson (State Assembly District 30 – Santa Cruz, San Luis Obispo, Monterey Counties): “Masks simply do not prevent diseases or infections so we must find another avenue.” 

  • Chris Coulombe (2nd Congressional District California – North Coast Region): “The government does not have the authority to instate a mask band. It Can inform the people that the government does not require you to wear a mask. But it cannot remove your right to place a mask on your face.”

Question 3: If elected, would you work to ensure that uninsured Californians can continue to access free Covid vaccines in 2025 and beyond?

Question 3 background information supplied to candidates: The federal government has ended the Bridge Access Program, the free Covid vaccine program for uninsured/underinsured Americans. While California has extended its own version for uninsured Californians through the end of 2024, its future remains uncertain after that.

  • Dalila Epperson (State Assembly District 30 – Santa Cruz, San Luis Obispo, Monterey Counties): The data from COVID vaccinations show they do not prevent COVID.

  • Chris Coulombe (2nd Congressional District California – North Coast Region): If there is a treatment for Covid, that is demonstrated empirically to have benefit, Then I see no issue with the government purchasing that for the uninsured at a significant discount from the Drug manufacturers

Question 4: If elected, what would you do to make more free Covid tests and masks available to the public?

Dalila Epperson (State Assembly District 30 – Santa Cruz, San Luis Obispo, Monterey Counties): “Masks do not prevent COVID nor infections.”

Chris Coulombe (2nd Congressional District California – North Coast Region): “Incentivize the further study and effectiveness of Covid countering measures.”

Question 5: Is there anything you would like to add about what actions you would take, if elected, to protect our community from COVID and other airborne diseases?

Dalila Epperson (State Assembly District 30 – Santa Cruz, San Luis Obispo, Monterey Counties): “To isolate and have someone help care for you while you’re ill is best. Wash your hands routinely is still the best preventative though.”

Chris Coulombe (2nd Congressional District California – North Coast Region): “Create legislation that incentivizes the health support of experienced members of our society. Meaning, Creating healthier, environments, and other services such as provide physical therapy and exercise activities inside of retirement communities. This can be done through government tax breaks. We have to increase our likelihood of survival through strength, not weakness.” 

Thank you to all of the candidates who took time to take part in this survey. 

Senior and Disability Action
Contact: info@sdaction.org

Co-sponsored by: Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund (DREDF), Pan End It!, Independent Living Resource Center San Francisco, The Center for Independent Living, Golden Gate Senior Services, Fit Test for All, Mask Bloc San Jose, Marked by Covid, Healthcare Workers for Abolition, We Are The Wayside Los Angeles, Mask Together America.

Disclaimer: SDA does not endorse political candidates. The information provided here is informational only. For our San Francisco and California propositions and measures voting guide, click here.